Is there a word that is balanced between dystopia and utopia, leaning more towards the utopian end of things?
I ask because my utopia is flawed, but not so flawed it’s a dystopia.
See, I love the idea of America: the vision of an America as portrayed by our Founders, with a few changes because they didn’t know about some of the things that have come about and are yet to come.
I want to be able to say “Land of the Free” without wincing, without any feeling of guilt or irony or sadness.
I don’t believe in absolute freedom, because I want to live in a country that is inhabited by others than myself. When other people become involved, freedoms must be adapted to allow the maximum possible freedom for myself and for each of them. Certain basic freedoms must be granted to each of us for this to work: the freedom to access information (with qualifiers), the freedom to speak, the freedom to assemble peacefully, the freedom to work, the freedom to confront their accusers, the freedom to be fat or skinny or dirty or clean or blonde or black or old or young or male or female or anything in between, the freedom to belong to any organization, the freedom to be reclusive, the freedom to be eccentric and different (or a copycat), the freedom to create, the freedom to own property and use it as one will (with a few qualifiers), the freedom to keep that property and not have it taken away and given to someone else who “will use it better”, the freedom from excess taxation, the freedom to be both represented in government and to speak for themselves in their governance, the freedom to procreate (but not a mandate to procreate), the freedom to refrain from procreation, the freedom to love, the freedom to partner with any other consenting adult, the freedom to own things, the freedom to travel unmolested by government officials and authorities within our borders (with qualifiers), the freedom to believe what one will, the freedom to shop as one will, the freedom to decorate and celebrate as one will, that sort of thing. I’ll get to those qualifiers in a minute.
I want people in my utopia to have equal access to opportunities. They should have the chance to try, even if others may think they don’t qualify or want to exclude them based on various factors, including but not limited to: where they live, how they dress, their accent, their degree of wealth, their family, or their choice in organizations and friends. They may not succeed, but they should have the chance to try.
Now, those pesky qualifiers. Freedom to access information is important, particularly public information and actions performed by our elected employees. Personal information should be deeply protected, released only with the permission of the person to whom that information relates – this includes information regarding health, wealth, safety, and habits, and permission applying on a case-by-case basis. In other words, if a person gives permission for someone to access a portion of their personal information, that permission is only for that particular piece of information, and only for that single instance. It cannot be permission for unlimited access to all of their personal information forever and forever, nor does giving permission to one person constitute permission for others to access it. When personal information mus be accessed (say by law enforcement), then accessing it must be difficult and require complying with strict standards and passing through a variety of barriers. It must not ever be easy or routine. Any infractions must be severely punished. In the computer age, this means privacy of personal information is even more important.
Freedom of speech carries with it certain responsibilities. Speaking deliberate falsehoods to cause disruptions and to inflict harm upon others is a misuse – a criminal use – of that freedom. This extends to any sort of communication, not just verbal. Now, I’m not stupid. I know that sometimes, in order to right a wrong, hurtful things have to be said. The difference, as any intelligent person knows, is a combination of documentable fact and intent. So, libel and slander stay on to keep the utopia just and fair. And under speech, I include copyrights and patents. Copyrights and patents are limited and have expiration dates. Once something enters the public domain, it remains there and cannot be re-copyrighted or re-patented so long as it remains in common usage. If something becomes “forgotten”, and isn’t commonly used anymore – and it can be proved that it isn’t in common usage, it can then be re-copyrighted or re-patented. Things like the “Happy Birthday Song” or the smiley face, for example, could not be copyrighted in my utopia because they are entrenched in the public domain. Trademarks and licenses are different, because they are created and purchased and as long as the fees are paid they belong to the payer (individual or corporate).
There wouldn’t be any of the “pc” nonsense. If a person is “offended” by what someone else says, does, watches, reads, paints, or owns, they just have to politely look away. No one is required to participate in everything everyone else does, and in my utopia, they can’t prevent others from doing things that give them pleasure.
The qualifier to this is that they can’t inflict actual measurable harm on others by what they do – a criminal act is criminal no matter who commits it. Now, what constitutes a crime? Any act that is performed to deliberately harm another is a crime – most notably acts of violence or theft. Someone singing religious songs is not causing deliberate harm or damaging property (unless they have my singing voice, but that’s different, isn’t it?). Someone wishing someone else a “blessed day” isn’t causing harm, no matter how much the listener hates hearing it. Being “offended” is not justification for preventing someone else from saying or doing or being something.
And in my utopia, anyone who reacts to someone else’s pleasure by committing an act of violence is a criminal. If someone gets drunk, wears skimpy clothes, wears lots of bling bling, walks alone after dark, or does other such things, and they are robbed, raped, beaten, killed, or even verbally harassed or threatened for doing those things, the person doing the robbing, raping, beating, killing, threatening, and harassing is at fault and a criminal. In my utopia, there is no “victim-blaming”, the person who commits the act of violence is the one on trial and the one who will be punished if convicted.
Children are a special case because they lack the knowledge and experience to protect themselves – any crime committed against a child by an adult carries a triple penalty. Any adult male who impregnates a minor is automatically convicted of rape because in my utopia, any man who “loves” an underage girl has the self control to wait until she is of legal age, and if he doesn’t, he has to pay for it both in prison time and in restitution to the girl – restitution will depend upon the girl and whether she chooses to give birth and keep the baby.
I put qualifiers on owning property because in my utopia, only full citizens could own property. Immigrants, visitors, and businesses that are not owned and operated by resident citizens can only lease property, not own it in my utopia. and those citizens who own property can do pretty much what they want on their property so long as it doesn’t obscure, block or damage someone else’s property. I’m not talking property values – I’m talking actual physical damage. If one person has a child who’s heavy into restoring old cars, then they have the right to have car parts scattered on their property, so long as the parts don’t cross into anyone else’s property. That includes cars up on cinder blocks. The most neighbors can do is ask that such cars be covered with a tarp. They can’t fine and harass the property owner witha car-mad child. If one person loves growing roses, and a neighbor is allergic to roses, the rose grower still has the right to grow roses. If one person likes to paint their house in bright colors and string up lights and fill their land with tacky plastic flamingos, well, it’s their land. They can do that. And no government agency or business can take the land away from its current owner. They can offer to buy it, and if the owner refuses to sell, they can offer higher prices for it until they reach their limit, and explain their reasons for wanting that particular piece of land. If the owner still refuses to sell, they have to accept it and plan around it instead. In my utopia, a person’s home is their own personal mini-kingdom. And , in keeping with property ownership, we must discuss property taxes. There will be no ad valorem taxation. Period. Nada. Property taxes will be tied to the actual value of the land and cannot exceed 2% of that value, ever.
I put qualifiers on travel because while I firmly believe people should be able to move around in their own country without hindrance, I also realize that sometimes some restrictions must be placed on methods of travel for safety reasons – hence traffic laws and carry-on baggage restrictions. In my utopia, no citizen will ever be barred from traveling in our country. They may have to comply with speed limits and traffic signs, and weight restrictions and availability, but they shouldn’t have to be strip searched, forbidden to use a particular method of transportation, or delayed so they miss their scheduled buses, trains, or flights. Non-citizens, however, don’t have those protections.
And I put qualifiers on taxes, too. When we get large groups of people living together,t here are administrative costs to keep things all smooth and comfortable. That means either placing fees on everything or collecting a general tax to distribute between the services best performed by a government rather than private agencies. That tax amount should never ever exceed 5% of a person’s total income. 5% should be enough money, collected from every single citizen, to provide the needed services. There are a lot of services our government attempts to provide that it shouldn’t even be dabbling in – and that’s a waste of taxpayer dollars. Of course, we could go to a fee-based society. I kind of like that idea, but as I’m not too sure how workable it would be, this is a blurred part fo my utopia. In a fee-based society, we’d pay fees for specific services: auto tag fees would be divided between traffic law enforcement and road maintainence; property fees would be divided between sewage, water, schools, public facilities and park maintainence; gasoline fees would go towards fuel regulation oversight and road maintainence; licensing fees would go to support agencies that regulate whatever’s being licensed; there would be usage fees for maintaining public facilities – either through an entry fee or an annual fee billed to the local residents – kind of like zoo asses, we could buy park passes for our favorite parks and such. People who couldn’t afford essential fees might prefer an annual taxation that would give them access to the fee-entry public facilities – not to exceed 5% of their annual income. Maybe we could have both a fee-based system and a tax based system, with the taxes waiving certain fees. I think I like that. Let’s put it in my utopia.
I also have qualifiers on governance. As it currently stands, American government is no longer for the people by the people. Our elected employees who are supposed to represent us don’t. In my utopia, all government officials must be accessible to the people they represent – any person in their constituency has the right to call them, email them, or visit them in person at any time during normal business hours. Their constituency takes precedence and priority over everyone else – even the president of the US, who is after all just another elected employee. And every citizen has the right to visit or contact any of their elected employees – including the president – and receive back a personal reply that actually addresses their concerns, not form letters written by some attorney and signed by an undersecretary.
There’s more, but you get the gist. My utopia requires a lot of personal responsibility and awareness. It’s probably not for everyone, which is why it’s a flawed utopia.
So, what’s your utopia like?